Name: Daniela Rosa de Oliveira
Type: MSc dissertation
Publication date: 10/04/2019
Advisor:
Name |
Role |
|---|---|
| Euzeneia Carlos | Advisor * |
Examining board:
| Name |
Role |
|---|---|
| Adelia Maria Miglievich Ribeiro | Internal Alternate * |
| Euzeneia Carlos | Advisor * |
| José Eduardo Léon Szwako | External Examiner * |
| Luciana Andressa Martins de Souza | Internal Examiner * |
Summary: ABSTRACT
This dissertation aims to analyze the interactions between the feminist movements and the government of the state of Espírito Santo in the production of public policies for women, understanding how this process of socio-state interaction, its configuration and dynamics occurs. The period analyzed was 2003, when the Secretariat for Policies for Women (SPM / PR) was created, the first managing body of the Federal Government, until 2016, the year of implementation of the Secretariat for Policies for Women in the State Government. The
assumptions of analysis are based on Brazilian studies that demonstrate that social movements develop complex and diversified relations with the state rather than being pure, coherent, and stable models, many of which combine multifaceted dimensions of collective action, thus effecting multiple possibilities of interaction. To this interpretative key are added the theory of the political process, especially the concept of repertoire of collective action and repertoire of interaction, and historical neoinstitutionalism with its notion of institutional fit, mobilized as analytical lenses. Complementing the theoretical framework we include the concept of institutional activism and the contributions of feminist studies. We will take up this challenge of contributing to the theory of social movements and feminist theories in stripping this field of relations between civil society and the State, especially on the configurations of socio-state interactions in the Brazilian context post 2000. The analysis of the data points to changes in the repertoire of action and interaction of the feminist movements of the Capixaba, including their positioning in relation to the State, which ranged from a situation of opposition or even indifference, to the search for a direct relationship focused on politics public sector, by acting in the state spaces either through the participatory institutions, or of the occupation of positions in the bureaucracy. The data were collected through in-depth interviews conducted with feminist activists active in both the movement organizations and the state bureaucracy, to which a set of documentary data collected throughout the research will be associated.
Keywords: Feminist movement; State; socio-state interactions; repertoires of action and interaction; public policy.
